Sadly, yes she did say that.

It pretty much sums up CCP's attitude lately.

As it is.. as long as you force this bad UI or inventory, I am not interestet in your "AT 10" or "EvE TV". So please bring DevBlogs.. not a nebulous comment from a Dev who is not involved in the development process.
I only pay attention to devblogs by now. Other activities will not be noticed!

You are right! But it was soon after the release of this sh!t inventory and shortly after the subscription renewal of my accounts. I and many others (incuding CCP) where maximal pi$$ed off and we all over reacted a little bit.
But it is something CCP has to handle if they ignore testserver feedback at once and bring every crap online. Although it was possible to see the upcoming desaster.

Someone from CCP had a very good idea.. to bring new feature as optional feature. But this idea is abandoned now. The only good idea from a Dev .. and CCP does not do it.

you should propably use your signature to tell us more about who you are and what you do at CCP, that might help with these kind of misunderstandings ;)

Better yet, a wiki page that has each team with their current project (if project is publicly known) and/or area of expertise as well as a list of current members and past projects.

*shrug* to be quite honest, I'm not even sure what all the teams are and what they do which is why I suggested it. And on the contrary, I don't hate the devs. Though I must say, I've been civil in all my responses to the devs and have never and will never be otherwise towards them. I find it a shame that when someone who doesn't flame all the time (actually, at all) on the forums brings up an idea to make the dev teams a bit more transparent so that the misunderstandings about what each dev team and member actually does (from my perspective) I get a flippant and rude response. Pretty disappointing in my eyes. Had the response been "I'm not too keen on that idea, it could open the devs up to being flamed and insulted more." or something similar in context or tone I would have bowed out gracefully.

*snip*
Furthermore it is annoying that the window for a wreck changes to the ship's cargo hold after looting. It must close itself. The seperate looting window must close itself after looting.

Will be a nice little patch; however, could you have a talk with the graphics department? I do NOT see CCP's sudden die hard addiction to camo skins. Honestly, do you see any trees, shrubs, or bushes in space to blend in with?? IMHO they are ass ugly. Take the CNR for example. Granted, the raven looks like a cancerous deformed ship, but now with tech camo it looks like it is a sickly cancerous deformed ship with leprosy or something. Its nice CCP wants to make them stand out but damn.

At least go with some black hulls with variation in trim colors and crap like that. Just seems ******** to have a ship painted in camo in a space environment.

So what you're saying is that camo ships should have a smaller sig radius stat to represent the greater difficulty in automatic identification and targeting?

It might have gotten lost but there are BR that are not filtered by ISD becouse they cannot anwer them easily. Can a dev go thru and clear out the NPE, and UI portions of the Bug report system.

The green edge bug reprort was posted on the first Sisi build and only got noticed becouse I posted a seperate post about it and contact ISD directly to get it on the defect list.